Why run clinical trials in Latin America
A 650M+ patient pool that is under-enrolled relative to its size, and regulatory start-up from 2.8 months — in your time zone.
Meet our Experts650M+ Patient Pool
2.8 mo Fastest Start-Up
20-30% Cost Savings vs US
15.6% of Global Phase III
FDA NAI Proven Track Record
Enrollment, not science, is what delays trials
Roughly 80% of clinical trials fail to meet their enrollment timelines, and up to half of research sites enroll one patient or none at all. With a delayed launch costing as much as $8M in lost revenue per day, where you place a study has stopped being a cost decision and become a timeline decision.
~80% Trials missing enrollment timelines
Up to 50% Sites enrolling one patient or none
$8M Lost revenue per day of delay

The patients are there, and under-enrolled
Latin America holds more than 8% of the world's population but hosted only about 3.6–5% of global oncology trials in 2023. That gap is the opportunity: 650M+ people, over 80% of them urban, with treatment-naïve populations and far less competition per site than North America or Western Europe.
It is also one of the most ancestrally admixed populations on the planet — Indigenous, European and African lineages within the same trial population. For sponsors who need enrollment that reflects real-world patient diversity, that representativeness is structural here rather than something you have to engineer site by site.
650M+ Population, 80%+ urban
8%+ Of world population
3.6-5% Of global oncology trials
Two hemispheres, one shorter calendar
For influenza, RSV and other seasonal indications, the Southern Hemisphere winter runs roughly six months offset from the Northern one. Sponsors can run a parallel cohort here while their U.S. and European sites wait for the season to arrive, opening two enrollment windows in the same year instead of waiting a full cycle for the second.
~6 mo Calendar offset vs Northern Hemisphere
2x / yr Seasonal enrollment windows
Lower cost, same time zone
Sponsors in Brazil and Argentina typically pay 20–30% of equivalent U.S. costs, cheaper per site than Western Europe, Oceania or Asia-Pacific. Unlike those regions, Latin America shares U.S. time zones, so the savings don't cost you real-time collaboration. And this is not a shrinking market: regional clinical trial spend is projected to grow from about $1.5B in 2025 to $2.8B by 2033, an 8.2% CAGR, with Argentina expected to post the fastest growth in the region.
20-30% Cost vs US
8.2% Regional CAGR to 2033
0-2 hrs Time difference from US East
MedTech is where the region is professionalizing fastest
Device research is the niche most CROs in the region treat as a side line, and it is the one growing into serious work. Latin America accounted for 2.1% of the global medical device clinical trials market in 2024 — about $357M, heading to $457M by 2030 — and within that, pivotal studies are both the largest segment at 42.4% and the fastest growing, with Brazil leading regional growth. Pivotal device work is exactly the kind that has to survive an FDA inspection.
2.1% Of global device-trial market
42.4% Pivotal share, and growing
Class I-III Device experience

The rules are getting faster, not slower
Brazil's Law 14.874/2024, in force since August 2024 and regulated by Decree 12.651/2025, gives the regulator 90 business days to respond to a trial application and lets studies start on local ethics committee review alone, removing a layer that used to define Brazilian start-up. Every country in the region operates under ICH-GCP with active inspection systems, and sponsors already trust LatAm with pivotal work: the region carries roughly 15.6% of global Phase III oncology trials, even while early-phase activity stays thin.
90 days Brazil statutory response window
15.6% Of global Phase III oncology trials
Six different start-up clocks, and where we sit on them
"Latin America" is not a single regulatory environment. Median time from submission to first patient ranges from under three months to nine, and that spread is the most important variable in a regional feasibility decision.
08 / Where friction shows upWhere it gets hard, and how we clear it
A study placed in Peru or Colombia can wait two to three times longer to activate than the same study in Mexico. Regulatory timelines and customs are where trials lose time in this region, and neither is solved remotely. LatinaBA runs in-country regulatory experts who get submissions right the first time and dedicated customs brokers who handle import/export country by country, so the friction is absorbed before it reaches your timeline.
3.2x Spread between fastest and slowest country
4 Countries with our own regulatory staff
- Enrollment timelines, site under-enrollment and cost of delay: Clinical Trials Arena.
- Population share, oncology trial share, Phase III share and country start-up timelines: Reframing Clinical Research in Latin America, PMC.
- Brazil Law 14.874/2024 review window: Clinical Leader.
- Regional market size and CAGR: Grand View Research.
- Medical device trial market share, size and pivotal-study segment: Grand View Research.
- Cost differential: Clinical Leader.
One team, for the life of the study
Our own record is auditable: an FDA PMA inspection in Chile for a Class III device that closed with No Action Indicated, and an FDA inspection of a biologic study that closed with no findings — both as top recruiter. Behind that sits a quality system of 60+ validated SOPs and policies, tested by more than 50 capability audits.
LatinaBA works in Spanish, English and Portuguese across four countries where it holds its own legal entity — three independent regulatory frameworks in Latin America plus Mexico — so if one agency slows down, your study keeps moving through another. Sponsors keep the same point of contact from start to finish, with a direct line to senior management rather than a rotating account team.
Talk to our team4 Countries with own legal entity
ES / EN / PT Working languages
60+ Validated SOPs
50+ Capability audits